Tag Archives: Semiotics

MA Project Work: Presence of Absence

My non-linear and semi-autobiographical works examine the processes we use for communicating, manipulating and reading visual messages. In this series of British and Indian imagery, the frame and grid provide a structure that facilitates a dialogue between inside/ outside and a tension between what is known, assumed and thought.

989784173d72d0b03dd304e2b5dbbef2screen
78ba0233627126c95fbea0a84db6e1c6screen

3726b20b39ca932a3e183f69d0d93d20screen

Presence of Absence – Series 1

2835b8789cc7efae7490a8ac0061a94bscreen
4beac347582af3e4a9091538dbb4468cscreen

4ac419e3f2a7b21518f79aff61d1ced3screen

Presence of Absence – Series 2

Advertisements

Between Limit and Transgression: The play of Meaning at the Image’s Edge

Today I finished my MA project research paper. Time for a nice pint.

Abstract

How can the frame of the two-dimensional still image instigate a tension between presence and absence, and a play between limit and transgression?

A frame, by conventional definition, is an assertion that the edges of the still image are necessary for containing and restricting representation. As a self-contained semiotic device, the frame presents to the viewer a sign, or a collection of signs, surrounded by an indeterminable nothingness, which can never come into view. The image frame’s purpose, then, is to make the world it contains ‘ordered and rational’ (Friedberg, 2009, p.42), by structuring, limiting and closing the field of two-dimensional representation with the intention to fix meaning and context neatly within its four borders.

This inquiry, however, challenges the notion that the frame presents fixed and stable meaning; instead the frame is a device that is capable of facilitating a dialogue between inside/ outside, presence/ absence. It is this indeterminable space outside the frame that the first part of this investigation looks at in depth. Examples from drawing and photography demonstrate instances when the edges of the image support a tension between what is present or viewable in the image, and what is absent, unseen, out of view, beyond its borders. Gilles Deleuze’s concept of the ‘out-of-field’ provides the theoretical basis for an exploration into how the still image is able to signify a “somewhere else” in space and time outside the frame (Deleuze, 2005, p.18).

The investigation then goes on to explore other ways in which the still image is able to transgress the fixity of the frame. The Exquisite Corpse and patchwork quilt exemplify a frame or grid with possibilities for limitless spatial expansion. In these procedural activities, the grid is the underlying ordering and sequencing mechanism, which structures a ‘dynamic tension’ between ‘rules and transgression’ (Kern, 2009, p.5). An examination of these ideas is then explored in relation to the pixel-based digital image, with its potential for infinite compositional transformation and spatial development.

This inquiry determines that the still image frame is capable of instigating a dialogical play or irresolvable tension, between what is present in the frame, and what is absent, beyond its borders. This inquiry also shows that the frame or gridded mechanism in dynamic spatial development facilitates a ‘movement of a chain’, a transformative process in which meaning and context are inherently boundless (Derrida, 1980, p.292).

Key words: Frame, Representation, Presence/ Absence, Semiotics, Play

Empty Signs

59_img093159_img105059_img068159_img069259_29img081359_img072859_img072959_img076059_img074259_img077659_img083159_img081959_img086759_img066859_img087659_img088459_img088759_img105259_img080359_img091659_img092859_img095559_img096059_img097259_img103159_img099059_img101459_img104659_img092859_img107759_img168059_img105559_img161059_img107959_img112259_img111359_img113259_img162059_img103959_img167159_img0799259_img0947

A new photographic series of Kannada scripts. Inspired by Roland Barthes’ book Empire of Signs, these images explore signs of cultural logic and convention that are absent of meaning to the nonmember/ outsider.

Runcible Series

308876_10150824706570691_714695690_21133407_768481964_n

I have just finished a new series of drawings that place Edward Lear’s nonsense word ‘runcible’ within various disparate visual contexts.

‘Runcible’ is a nonsense word invented by Edward Lear in 1871. In his poetry this word is used to form semiotic gaps that cannot be satisfactorily resolved or understood by the reader. The nonsensicality of this word is further compounded when used by Lear as an adjective to describe a range of disparate nouns, including: a runcible spoon, raven, cat, wall, hat and goose.

This series of drawings situates Lear’s ‘runcible’ within a variety of disparate scenarios. Through a process of contextual shifting the word suggests a multitude of meanings that conflict or contradict – The result is nonsense.

See the full series here.